Tung-Lin Wu vs Carl Emil Overbeck Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Nov at 03:17 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Wu vs C. Emil Overbeck

TPE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

DEN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Wu 1 - 0 Overbeck
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tung-Lin Wu winning 2 and Carl Emil Overbeck winning 0. The last match between Tung-Lin Wu and Carl Emil Overbeck was at the Brisbane 3 Challenger, 14-11-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Tung-Lin Wu getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wu | 1 |
| Overbeck | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Brisbane 3 Challenger(11-14-25)
T. Wu vs C. E. Overbeck H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $106,780 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.27% (273-230) | Career Total W/L | 64.00% (48-27) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Wu vs C. E. Overbeck Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Tung-Lin Wu has been more effective on their second serve, winning 46.13% of points recently, compared to Carl Emil Overbeck's 40.91%.
- Return Game: On opponents' second serve, Tung-Lin Wu wins 47.46% of points, slightly more than Overbeck's 45.47%. Conversely, Overbeck has a marginal edge on first serve returns, with 27.95% to Wu’s 27.39%.
- Under Pressure: Wu saves 56.34% of breakpoints, outperforming Overbeck’s 52.21% save rate, suggesting better resilience in critical moments.
- Match Performance: Over the past year, Overbeck has a higher win rate at 67.57%, surpassing Wu’s 44.68%, indicating superior overall performance.
- Surface Advantage: Both players excel on Hard surfaces, showing identical win rates of 57%. Does this give them an equal edge in this match?
- Player Level and Competition: Wu generally competes in higher-level Challenger/ITF tournaments, facing stronger opponents on average, compared to Overbeck’s Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events.
- Deciding Sets Capability: If the match reaches a deciding set, Overbeck holds an advantage with a 57% win rate, notably higher than Wu's 25%.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Overbeck has a slight edge in breakpoint conversion rates, achieving 37.59% compared to Wu’s 34%.
Editorial Prediction (November 14, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Tung-Lin Wu and Carl Emil Overbeck is set to be an intriguing battle of strengths and weaknesses. Wu boasts a better second serve performance and resilience under pressure, translating into a competitive edge during crucial points.
Overbeck, however, has been more consistent overall in the past year, achieving a higher match win rate and displaying stronger performance in deciding sets. His ability to convert breakpoints more effectively adds to his advantageous position.
Both players have shown prowess on hard courts, but Overbeck's recent form and tactical advantages in breakpoint situations suggest he may have the upper hand in this encounter.
Considering these elements, Carl Emil Overbeck is likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.
Tung-Lin Wu vs Carl Emil Overbeck Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Wu vs C. E. Overbeck H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:18:5 | Average Match Time | 1:18:5 |
| 77% (44/57) | 1st Serve % | 73% (37/51) |
| 80% (35/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (28/37) |
| 54% (7/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (6/14) |
| 100% (2/2) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (17/51) | Return Points Win % | 26% (15/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Wu Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | W | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
QF | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(5) 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
C. E. Overbeck Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 7-6(1) | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||

T. Wu vs C. E. Overbeck Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.27% (273/230) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.00% (48/27) |
| 54.78% (630/520) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.08% (102/65) |
| 52.35% (5761/5243) | Games Win/Loss | 54.80% (857/707) |
| 57.07% (210/158) | Hard Win/Loss | 72.73% (16/6) |
| 51.56% (33/31) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.42% (29/19) |
| 43.28% (29/38) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 2041 | Aces Total | 237 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 945 | Total Double Faults | 168 |
| 1:35:33 | Average Match Time | 1:13:22 |
| 489.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 317.59 |
| 66% (21359/32344) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2374/3693) |
| 69% (14719/21359) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (1611/2374) |
| 51% (5618/10984) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (622/1319) |
| 42% (1326/3164) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (178/406) |
| 39% (12749/32505) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1555/3687) |
| 23.08% (3/10) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.33% (8/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.14% (8/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.40% (175/159) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 63.03% (75/44) | Futures W/L | 65.67% (44/23) |
| 55% (268/483) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (48/75) |
| 20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (76/173) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (6/12) |
| 45% (70/155) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (11/17) |
| 82% (293/240) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (42/40) |
| 17% (293/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (42/2) |
| 16% (209/33) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (33/8) |